







I conducted an audit of direct competitors (Ideanote, Trello) and powerful, indirect AI tools (ChatGPT, Bard) to map the current landscape. The analysis revealed a distinct market gap: organisational tools lacked deep AI integration, while pure AI tools provided powerful generation but no structure, often overwhelming users with a "blank canvas" problem. This created a clear opportunity for Purl to build a bridge between these two worlds.



As we were defining a completely new workflow, I began mapping out the core user flow, to establish a shared vision with stakeholders. The feedback on these was crucial for refining the information hierarchy. From there, I transitioned into low-fidelity prototypes, which were used to test and validate the platform's primary navigation and the intuitive flow between the main Kanban board and the detailed "overlay" views for each idea.

Conducted unmoderated usability studies on the MVP to demonstrate viability to investors and identify improvements. Users completed key ideation tasks, providing feedback on reducing cognitive load, refining user flow, and enhancing AI-human interaction.
The information architecture was designed to directly solve the core problems we identified in our research. The structure is built on a simple, user-centric principle: Clarity first, depth second. To achieve this, we abandoned a complex, multi-page approach in favour of a single, unified Kanban board framework. This architecture organises the ideation process into distinct "thinking spaces," corresponding to the stages our research identified as critical to a user's workflow. By using an in-context "overlay" for detailed analysis, the IA keeps the primary view clean and focused, allowing users to progressively disclose information as they need it, which directly addresses the problem of cognitive overload.





As a co-founder of Purl, this project was a unique lesson in navigating the intersection of design, business strategy, and product management. The challenge was not just to design an interface, but to build a viable product from the ground up, making critical decisions about where to focus our limited resources to create a compelling and fundable MVP.